Quantcast

Pandemic to Remain Until Nations Reach Treaty on New WHO Powers

'The proposed WHO agreement is unnecessary, and is a threat to sovereignty and inalienable rights... '

(John RansomHeadline USA) Negotiations for a new treaty with the World Health Organization started quietly in December, and many experts feel that public health officials will continue to push the pandemic until a new treaty is settled.

That’s one reason why public health officials are continuing to sound the alarm over the COVID pandemic, because it will help push through a hastily concluded treaty, according to Dr. Joseph Mercola writing at the Epoch Times.

In a podcast by The Pulse’s Joe Martino, one expert said that such a treaty would give the WHO an inordinate amount of authority over sovereign countries and that a proposed WHO treaty is just a power grab for the organization, using COVID as an excuse.

Shabnam Palesa Mohamed, a member of the World Council for Health, said that the WHO would essentially replace the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the United States, and similar agencies in other countries, under the terms of the treaty that the WHO wants the world to accept.

...article continued below
- Advertisement -

“The proposed WHO agreement is unnecessary, and is a threat to sovereignty and inalienable rights,” said Mohamed.

“It increases the WHO’s suffocating power to declare unjustified pandemics, impose dehumanizing lockdowns, and enforce expensive, unsafe, and ineffective treatments against the will of the people.”

In short, the WHO is convening what amounts to a constitutional world convention, in the guise of discussing health policy, while really executing a power grab.

...article continued below
- Advertisement -

“On 1 December 2021, the members of the World Health Organization (WHO) reached consensus to start the process to draft and negotiate a convention… to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness and response,” said the European Council of the European Union, which supports a new treaty along the lines the WHO has proposed.

In addition to concerns that the WHO will allocate more power to itself, Mohamed pointed out that the WHO has a long history of conflicts of interest. While it’s supposed to be a publicly-funded organization, serving the public, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has been a major supporter of their work and the WHO has been a major supporter of anything Bill and Melinda Gates want.

Even proven One-Worlders, like the Council on Foreign Relations, denounced the relationship between China and the WHO, accusing the health organization of a dereliction of duty when it came to investigating the origins of COVID.

“The WHO’s weak response to China’s mishandling of the COVID-19 outbreak has laundered China’s image at the expense of the WHO’s credibility,” said the CFR.

Copyright 2022. No part of this site may be reproduced in whole or in part in any manner without the permission of the copyright owner. To inquire about licensing content, use the contact form at https://headlineusa.com/advertising.
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

TRENDING NOW

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

- Advertisement -