Quantcast
Wednesday, May 8, 2024

‘Lancet’ Deletes Study that Exposed Startling Stats on Vax-Related Deaths

'It is important that attempts are made to quantify the risk of harm and censorship of these attempts, rather than open scientific critique, does nothing to help reassure people... '

(Jacob Bruns, Headline USALancet, a peer reviewed medical journal, recently published and then removed a study that included unsettling statistics regarding COVID vaccine related death numbers, the Daily Sceptic reported.

The now-deleted study revealed that out of 325 autopsies of people who had recently received the COVID jab, 74% of those deaths were closely tied to the COVID jab.

According to the study, the COVID vaccine can be linked to decline in the health of one’s cardiovascular system, hematological system, respiratory system and “multiple organ systems.”

Researchers also noted that “most deaths occurred within a week from last vaccine administration,” while nearly three quarters of deaths were “directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination.”

They concluded the study by noting that there is a “high likelihood” of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and death in most cases.

Conducted by cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough, Yale epidemiologist Dr. Harvey Risch and their colleagues at the Wellness Company, the study was taken down within 24 hours after its publication Wednesday.

According to Lancet, it was removed because it might spread misinformation.

“This preprint has been removed by Preprints with the Lancet because the study’s conclusions are not supported by the study methodology,” the journal noted.

Though the study must still undergo peer review, Lancet suggested that it also failed to meet “screening criteria.”

Dr. Clare Craig, a pathologist and co-Chair of the HART pandemic advisory group, said that in her opinion the methods of the study were sound.

“It is important that attempts are made to quantify the risk of harm and censorship of these attempts, rather than open scientific critique, does nothing to help reassure people,” she noted.

Dr. Harvey Risch, one of the authors, called the decision “pure Government-directed censorship, even after the Missouri v. Biden injunction.”

Copyright 2024. No part of this site may be reproduced in whole or in part in any manner other than RSS without the permission of the copyright owner. Distribution via RSS is subject to our RSS Terms of Service and is strictly enforced. To inquire about licensing our content, use the contact form at https://headlineusa.com/advertising.
- Advertisement -

TRENDING NOW

TRENDING NOW