(Headline USA) President Joe Biden claims he came into office with a plan to fix inflation—just not the particular inflationary problem that the country now faces.
The current crisis—which has resulted in the worst economic conditions in more than four decades—began shortly after Biden took power in January 2021.
For months, the administration gaslit the American public by insisting the problem was only temporary and would quickly self-correct, contrary to conventional wisdom.
While Democrats have blamed supply-chain shortages, corporate greed and a litany of other factors, the biggest one has been reckless fiscal policy, with trillions of dollars in unfettered spending resulting in a significant devaluation of US currency.
Democrats also have encouraged joblessness by supplying increased federal benefits to those who have abandoned the labor force, while using vaccine mandates to force others out of their existing employment in the sputtering pandemic economy.
And Biden’s early policies aimed at curbing the reliance on fossil fuels have contributed to a surge in energy costs that drives up overhead for every other industry.
Yet, Biden’s belief is that a cluster of companies control too many industries, which reduces competition for both customers and workers.
That leads to higher prices and lower wages in what the White House claimed is an average cost of $5,000 annually for U.S. families.
Biden is now trying to remedy the situation with 72 distinct initiatives—everything from new rules for cell phone repairs to regulations on meatpacking to more merger reviews.
“The dynamics of the modern American economy—the increased consolidation and lack of competition—has distorted market incentives in important ways,” said Brian Deese, director of the White House National Economic Council. “The president gave us the direction that he wanted us to come back and say what could we do to address this issue of consolidation across industries in a way that would be durable.”
But even administration officials acknowledge that the initiatives outlined by the president’s seven-month-old competition council aren’t designed to quickly stop the nearly double-digit inflation that’s frustrating Americans and tanking Biden’s approval ratings.
Furthermore, business groups dispute the fundamental premise that competition has faded within the U.S. economy, and they are prepared to challenge the administration’s new initiatives in court.
“It will strangle economic growth,” said Neil Bradley, executive vice president and chief policy officer of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. “Ironically, what this will do is actually lead to more inflation.”
Part of Biden’s dilemma is that reorienting a bureaucracy to promote competition takes time, and voters want to see inflation start dropping now after having long waited fruitlessly for the administration to finally come around to addressing—rather than exacerbating—the problem.
Voters feel the bite of inflation with every trip they make to the grocery store or the gas station, yet the president is traveling the country to discuss solutions such as competition and new infrastructure that would have a much more gradual impact, if anything.
In a January survey by the University of Chicago, two-thirds of leading economists said that the concentrated power of companies does not explain the current rash of inflation.
New York University economist Thomas Philippon has welcomed the administration’s approach—while allowing it would do little to bring down prices.
As the author of the 2019 book The Great Reversal: How America Gave Up on Free Markets, Philippon is the source of the administration’s statement that market concentration places a $5,000 drag on an average family.
What Philippon observed was that other nations had embraced a level of antitrust enforcement and competition that no longer exists in America, resulting in lower costs for cell phone service, internet and airline tickets in Europe relative to the U.S.
“As a way to fight current inflation, it is unlikely to have a big impact in the short term, but it can still be useful,” Philippon said. “I think of it more as a positive side effect of something that should be done in any case.”
The Biden administration contends that even if the lack of competition didn’t directly trigger the recent spike in prices, it has contributed to inflation.
The White House Council of Economic Advisers blogged in July about how more sectors of the economy are effectively controlled by a smaller number of companies.
It cited studies that show how mergers led to higher prices for hospital services, health insurance, airline tickets and beer.
It also documented a decline in government reviews of mergers and noted that the 2020 federal lawsuits against Google and, separately, Facebook were the first major monopolization cases in 22 years.
After the second meeting of the government-wide competition council in late January, the White House charted its progress.
The Food and Drug Administration has proposed selling hearing aids over-the-counter, “lowering their cost from thousands of dollars to hundreds of dollars,” according to a White House statement.
The Federal Trade Commission will increase enforcement against restrictions that companies place on people repairing their own electronic devices.
The Transportation Department figures it can cut prices of airline tickets in the New York City area by opening up 16 slots to a low-cost carrier at the airport in Newark, New Jersey.
For proof that more competition can lead to lower prices, administration officials cite the example of eyeglasses. Before 1979, people could buy eyeglasses only from doctors who wrote their prescriptions. The FTC then passed a rule that forced doctors to give out prescriptions, causing the average price of glasses to fall 30.4% to $178 (in 1979 dollars).
The issue does not break cleanly along partisan lines. Republicans have long favored free-market capitalism and have clamored even more for trust-busting regulations in the tech-driven economy as several companies have demonstrated a clear anti-conservative bias.
Republican Sens. Todd Young of Indiana and Kevin Cramer of North Dakota have sponsored a bill to limit companies from using non-compete agreements, which can keep workers from going to another employer for more money.
But many in the business sector dispute Biden’s core premise that the U.S. economy has become less competitive. They argue that mergers allow companies to operate more efficiently and the resulting gains in productivity benefit consumers.
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce says market concentration had waned by 2017, and it intends to challenge some of the administration’s regulatory actions in court.
Airlines for America, a trade association, says that consumers are better off under industry consolidation. In inflation-adjusted terms, it said, the average price of a roundtrip ticket has fallen nearly $100 since 2010 to $306 in 2020.
The Business Roundtable, a group representing CEOs, said that at a time of high inflation “more burdensome government regulations are not what the economy or Americans need.”
Despite the pandemic and inflation, companies have still found ways to achieve historic profits. Corporate profits after tax equaled 11.8% of the total U.S. economy in the second quarter of last year, the highest share on record going back to 1947.
The Biden administration is arguing that government policy can ensure that more of that money goes to workers and customers.
The fact that the Biden administration is focused on corporate profits and structure could ultimately limit how much companies can charge and that could deter some inflation, said Barry Lynn, executive director of the Open Markets Institute.
“It sends a message,” Lynn said. “Just having cops walking the beat, having cops out there, saying, ‘Hey, we’re watching. We’re looking. We’re going to be checking your profit levels. We’re going to be targeting those who seem to be really exploiting their monopoly power.’ That’s going to have an effect.”
Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press
