With California‘s print-at-home ballots breaking heavily for Democrats, leftist media gaslighters have proceeded to ignore the suspicious circumstances in a bid to normalize systemic vote fraud.
A recent suppression poll by a so-called nonpartisan think tank with ties to a former Obama-era CIA director appeared perfectly timed to lay cover for the ballot-stuffing operations in the lead-up to the Sept. 14 election.
Reports estimated that 5 million votes had been returned thus far, out of the state’s 22 million registered voters.
Democrats were outpacing Republicans by a roughly 2-to-1 ratio, reported the Associated Press, and the early returns skewed heavily toward the elderly population, meaning young people, likely to lean even farther to the left, may push the advantage even farther in favor of incumbent Gov. Gavin Newsom.
In addition to allowing voters to print their own ballots, the state mailed ballots to every eligible voter and also permits ballot-harvesting, meaning that the election was prime to be stolen by well-organized and well-funded left-wing activist groups.
The Democrats in power likewise stacked the deck further in their favor by distributing return envelopes that showed clearly whether absentee voters supported or opposed the recall.
The San Francisco-based Public Policy Institute of California on Thursday released a poll indicating that 58% of likely voters opposed the recall, Breitbart reported.
Despite the fact that the poll varies widely from others that showed recall proponents gaining steam and even picking up a slight edge in the final weeks of the race, PPIC’s indicated that Newsom was beginning to shift the momentum back in his favor—although he was never in any real danger to begin with.
The group has recall proponents failing to go beyond 40% of the likely voters over the three weeks it has been running its survey.
The research was partially sponsored by the James Irvine Foundation, a radical leftist grantmaker and lobbyist. And indeed, most of those affiliated with the group have ties to similarly radical groups, which may be the norm for San Francisco.
More alarming, perhaps, is that Leon Panetta, the former CIA director and defense secretary for the Obama administration, sits on its board of directors.
Panetta, whose son Jimmy is a current Democrat congressman from Monterey County, has many such honorary memberships. Nonetheless, his presence in the high-stakes race raises questions about the poll’s neutrality and overall validity.
And about whether such findings might be used in tandem with the vote-fraud effort underway to bestow false legitimacy onto it.
Newsom’s opponents need only get 50% of the vote plus 1 to oust him from office, with rival frontrunner Larry Elder likely to replace him.
While Elder would still be stuck with a far-left legislature, he could proceed to implement reforms to help bring the state back into some semblance of normalcy and to clean up the corruption in its ranks.
Democrats also fear that if something were to happen to octogenarian Sen. Dianne Feinstein, a Republican governor would then have the ability to flip the US Senate back into GOP control, further derailing the Biden agenda.
“In what is sure to be a consequential recall election, 47 percent of likely voters are more enthusiastic than usual about voting,” claimed the suppression poll.
